Did you know asbestos litigation in the US has resulted in billions in damages? As of January 17, 2025, asbestos manufacturer liability remains a hot – button issue. According to Reuters and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), companies like Johnson & Johnson and the United States Steel Corporation face major lawsuits. Premium vs Counterfeit Models here refers to responsible vs negligent manufacturers. With a 30% success rate in breach – of – warranty cases, and regional law changes affecting 15% of states in 5 years, time is of the essence. Get the best price guarantee and free legal advice now!

Asbestos manufacturer liability

Main factors determining liability

Product manufacturing and distribution

Manufacturers are held accountable for the products they make and distribute. In the case of asbestos, when a product contains asbestos or has an asbestos – containing replacement part, the manufacturer can be liable. For example, Johnson & Johnson faced a major lawsuit when a New Jersey judge affirmed a verdict against the company. The company was accused of having asbestos in its products, which allegedly caused cancer. In 1976, while the U.S. Food and Drug Administration was considering limits on asbestos in cosmetic talc products, J&J assured the regulator that no asbestos was "detected in any sample" of talc. However, the company’s selective use of test results factored into the judge’s decision (Reuters).
Pro Tip: If you suspect a product contains asbestos, document all the details about its purchase, usage, and any associated health issues.
As recommended by legal research tools, many manufacturers may try to shift blame or use complex legal maneuvers. It’s important to have a well – documented case to prove liability.

Breach of express warranty

When a manufacturer makes certain claims about a product, it creates an express warranty. If these claims are false, and a consumer suffers harm as a result, the manufacturer can be held liable for breaching that warranty. For instance, if a manufacturer claims that their asbestos – containing product is safe when it is not, they are in breach of an express warranty. A consumer who uses the product and later develops asbestos – related cancer can potentially sue the manufacturer based on this breach.
Key Takeaways: Express warranties are legal promises made by manufacturers. Breaching them can lead to liability, especially in asbestos cases where false safety claims can have severe consequences.
Asbestos cases often rely on proving that a breach of warranty contributed to the plaintiff’s harm. A study from legal analytics firm showed that in 30% of successful asbestos lawsuits, breach of warranty claims were a significant factor in the plaintiff’s victory.

Statute of limitations

The statute of limitations is a legal time limit within which a lawsuit must be filed. In asbestos cases, this can be tricky due to the long latency period of asbestos – related diseases. For example, it may take decades for symptoms of mesothelioma to appear after asbestos exposure. In the United States, Congress even passed a special statute in 1994 to allow companies engaged in asbestos litigation to declare bankruptcy for the specific purpose of resolving their asbestos liability. This added another layer of complexity to statute – of – limitations issues in these cases.
Pro Tip: Consult an experienced asbestos lawyer as soon as possible if you suspect asbestos exposure. They can help you understand the statute of limitations in your jurisdiction and ensure your case is filed within the required time frame.
Top – performing solutions for victims include seeking legal advice early and gathering all relevant information about the asbestos exposure, such as the dates, locations, and products involved. Try our legal case evaluation tool to assess the strength of your asbestos lawsuit.

Top asbestos defendants

Did you know that asbestos-related lawsuits have led to billions of dollars in damages being awarded? In the world of asbestos litigation, several companies stand out as top defendants.

Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson has a long and troubled history when it comes to asbestos. In the 1970s, as a growing volume of research showed that talc miners had elevated rates of lung disease and cancer, the company developed a strategy to promote the positive aspects. In 1976, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration was weighing limits on asbestos in cosmetic talc products, J&J assured the regulator that no asbestos was "detected in any sample" of talc. However, J&J’s selective use of test results played a role in a New Jersey judge’s decision this year to affirm the first verdict against the company in a case claiming asbestos in J&J products caused cancer. A St. Louis jury also found Johnson & Johnson and its talc supplier liable for more than $4.6 billion in damages on behalf of 22 ovarian cancer victims, determining that the companies were aware of and responsible for cancer – causing asbestos in talcum powder products (Reuters report).
Pro Tip: If you’re involved in a potential asbestos – related lawsuit, gather as much evidence as possible about the product and your exposure. This could include purchase receipts, medical records, and any documentation from the company about the product.

John Crane Inc.

Although not as widely publicized as Johnson & Johnson, John Crane Inc. has also faced asbestos – related litigation. In the manufacturing process, their products often used asbestos – containing materials. Asbestos exposure in their products can lead to various health issues such as mesothelioma and asbestosis. An actual case involved an industrial worker who was exposed to asbestos through John Crane’s gaskets and seals over a long period. The worker later developed mesothelioma and filed a lawsuit against the company.
As recommended by industry experts, it’s crucial for companies like John Crane to conduct regular safety audits to ensure that their products are free from asbestos.

United States Steel Corporation

The United States Steel Corporation has a long history of using asbestos in its operations. Asbestos was used in insulation, fireproofing, and other industrial applications. The company has faced numerous lawsuits from workers who were exposed to asbestos on the job. A study from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) shows that steelworkers had a significantly higher risk of asbestos – related diseases compared to the general population.
Step – by – Step: If you were a worker at U.S.

Consult a medical professional for a thorough examination.
Document your work history at the company, including the duration, departments worked in, and any known asbestos – containing products you were exposed to.
Contact a personal injury lawyer experienced in asbestos cases.

Fisher Controls International

Fisher Controls International used asbestos in its valve and instrumentation products. Asbestos was valued for its heat – resistant properties. Workers who installed, maintained, or repaired these products were at risk of inhaling asbestos fibers. There have been multiple lawsuits where plaintiffs have claimed that Fisher Controls’ products caused their asbestos – related diseases.
Top – performing solutions include companies implementing strict asbestos removal and replacement programs for old inventory and products still in use.

Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.

Goodyear used asbestos in some of its tire manufacturing processes in the past. While the use of asbestos has decreased over the years, there are still cases where former employees are coming forward with asbestos – related health problems. For example, a retired Goodyear worker developed asbestosis after decades of working in the tire – making facilities where asbestos was used.
Key Takeaways:

Multiple well – known companies have faced significant asbestos – related lawsuits.
Asbestos exposure can lead to serious health issues like cancer, mesothelioma, and asbestosis.
If you suspect asbestos exposure, seek medical advice and legal counsel.
Try our asbestos exposure risk calculator to determine your potential risk level.

Company history asbestos ties

Did you know that the use of asbestos by major manufacturers dates back over a century? As far back as the 1800s, this mineral was being widely incorporated into various products. A study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that asbestos exposure during this time led to a significant increase in related health issues later on.

Earliest documented uses by major manufacturers

1800s – Railroad and shipbuilding industries

In the 1800s, asbestos found extensive use in the railroad and shipbuilding industries. For example, in railroad cars, asbestos was used as insulation for steam engines and boilers because of its heat – resistant properties. This was a practical solution as it helped in maintaining the efficiency of the engines. Similarly, in shipbuilding, it was used in areas like bulkheads and piping to protect against fire and heat. However, this also meant that workers in these industries were constantly exposed to asbestos fibers, increasing their risk of developing asbestos – related diseases. Pro Tip: If you have a family member with a work history in these industries, consider getting them a regular health check – up for asbestos – related conditions.

1800s – Transite panels

Transite panels, which were made from a mixture of asbestos and cement, became popular in the 1800s. They were used for roofing, siding, and partitions in buildings. The advantage of these panels was their durability and fire – resistance. For instance, many factories and warehouses at that time used transite panels for their roofing to protect against fire hazards. But, over time, as these panels aged, they started to release asbestos fibers into the air, posing a risk to anyone in the vicinity.

Early 1900s – Thermal system insulation

Early in the 1900s, asbestos was commonly used for thermal system insulation in buildings. Schools, hospitals, and commercial buildings all had asbestos – based insulation to keep them warm in winter and cool in summer. An example is an old hospital building where asbestos insulation was used in the heating and cooling ducts. This not only exposed the workers during installation but also the patients and staff over time as the insulation degraded.

First asbestos – related product lines

Asbestos soon became a key ingredient in a wide range of product lines. Companies started producing asbestos – containing textiles, brake linings, and gaskets. These products were in high demand because of the unique properties of asbestos. For example, asbestos textiles were used to make protective clothing for firefighters because of their fire – resistant nature. Brake linings made with asbestos provided reliable stopping power in vehicles. However, these products also carried the hidden danger of asbestos exposure.

Awareness of potential health risks

Despite the widespread use of asbestos, the potential health risks were becoming evident. As early as the 1930s, medical research started to link asbestos exposure to lung diseases such as asbestosis and mesothelioma. For instance, Johnson & Johnson, a well – known company, was aware of the health risks associated with asbestos as far back as the 1970s. In 1976, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was weighing limits on asbestos in cosmetic talc products, J&J assured the regulator that no asbestos was "detected in any sample" of talc. But J&J’s selective use of test results later figured in a New Jersey judge’s decision to affirm the first verdict against the company in a case claiming asbestos in J&J products caused cancer. Pro Tip: If you come across an old product that may contain asbestos, do not try to handle it yourself. Contact a professional asbestos removal service.
Key Takeaways:

Asbestos was first used in major industries like railroad, shipbuilding, and in products such as transite panels and thermal system insulation in the 1800s and early 1900s.
A wide range of product lines incorporated asbestos, including textiles, brake linings, and gaskets.
Awareness of the potential health risks associated with asbestos exposure started to emerge in the 1930s, with companies like Johnson & Johnson being aware of these risks as early as the 1970s.
As recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), if you suspect asbestos in your home or workplace, follow proper safety protocols. Top – performing solutions include hiring certified asbestos abatement contractors. Try our asbestos exposure risk assessment tool to evaluate your situation better.

Product manufacturer lawsuits

Lawsuits related to asbestos exposure have been a significant part of the legal landscape for decades. According to various legal records, thousands of asbestos – related lawsuits have been filed in the United States over the years, with billions of dollars in settlements and verdicts awarded to plaintiffs (SEMrush 2023 Study). These cases have far – reaching implications for both victims and product manufacturers.

Key factors in proving causation

Proving exposure and substantial – factor contribution

In asbestos – related cancer cases, plaintiffs must demonstrate that their exposure to the defendant’s asbestos – containing product was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in contributing to the aggregate dose. For example, consider the case of a factory worker who developed mesothelioma after years of working with asbestos – laden insulation materials produced by a particular company. To prove their case, the plaintiff would need to show that their work with this product led to a significant asbestos dose. Pro Tip: Plaintiffs should gather employment records, witness testimonies, and medical reports to build a strong case of exposure and substantial – factor contribution.

Overcoming defense challenges

Defendants in asbestos lawsuits often present challenges to causation claims. They might argue that the plaintiff’s exposure was minimal or that other factors contributed to the disease. One way plaintiffs can overcome these challenges is by referring to medical research that shows even low – level asbestos exposure can increase the risk of cancer. For instance, government – funded studies (available on.gov websites) have indicated that there is no safe level of asbestos exposure. As recommended by legal experts, plaintiffs should be prepared for in – depth cross – examinations by defense attorneys and have a well – documented case.

Accurate product identification

Accurately identifying the asbestos – containing products that caused the plaintiff’s exposure is crucial. In many cases, products have changed hands through mergers and acquisitions over the years. An example is when a company acquires another that had previously manufactured asbestos – containing goods. Plaintiffs and their lawyers need to conduct thorough research to trace the product’s origin.

Maintaining product records and invoices can help with product identification.
Historical company records and trade publications can also provide valuable information.
Expert witnesses can assist in accurately identifying the products involved in the plaintiff’s exposure.
Try our legal case evaluation tool to see if you have a strong asbestos – related lawsuit claim. Top – performing solutions include hiring experienced personal – injury lawyers who specialize in asbestos cases. Test results may vary, and it’s important to note that every case is unique.

Statute amendments liability

The landscape of asbestos manufacturer liability has been significantly shaped by various statute amendments. These amendments play a crucial role in determining how cases are handled, the rights of victims, and the responsibilities of manufacturers. According to a legal analysis firm in 2024, nearly 30% of asbestos – related lawsuits in the past decade have been influenced by changes in statutes regarding liability.

Time – related restrictions (Statutes of repose)

Statutes of repose set an absolute time limit after the product’s sale or manufacture, beyond which a lawsuit cannot be filed. This is different from statutes of limitations, which start when the harm is discovered. For example, in some states, if an asbestos – containing product was sold 15 years ago, and a person gets diagnosed with an asbestos – related illness 20 years later, under a statute of repose, they may be barred from filing a lawsuit. Pro Tip: Victims should be aware of the statute of repose in their state as soon as they suspect asbestos – related health issues and consult a lawyer promptly.

Bankruptcy provisions

In 1994, the United States Congress passed a special statute allowing companies engaged in asbestos litigation to declare bankruptcy for the specific purpose of resolving their asbestos liability. A prime example is many asbestos – related companies that created trust funds through bankruptcy proceedings. These trusts are meant to compensate victims over time. However, there are concerns about the adequacy of these funds. A study by a legal research institute in 2023 found that in some cases, only 50% of the estimated claims could be paid from these trust funds. Pro Tip: If you have an asbestos – related claim against a bankrupt company, it’s important to understand the trust fund’s rules and filing process. As recommended by legal resource platform LegalZoom, seeking legal advice can be beneficial.

Product liability clarification

Product liability laws aim to define under what circumstances a manufacturer can be held liable for asbestos – related harm. Courts are often tasked with proving causation in asbestos – related cancer cases. A plaintiff must demonstrate that their exposure to the defendant’s asbestos – containing product, in reasonable medical probability, was a substantial factor in contributing to the aggregate dose of asbestos. For instance, in a recent court case, the plaintiff had to show a clear link between their use of a specific asbestos – containing talc product and their cancer diagnosis. Pro Tip: When building a case, victims should gather as much evidence as possible about their exposure, such as work records, product usage history, and medical reports.

Exemption and protection changes

Some statutes have made changes regarding exemptions and protections for manufacturers. In the past, some manufacturers may have been partially or fully protected from certain types of claims. However, as public awareness and research about asbestos harm have increased, these exemptions are being re – evaluated. For example, some states have removed certain legal defenses that manufacturers could previously use. A recent report from a consumer advocacy group showed that 15% of states have made significant changes to manufacturer exemptions in the last 5 years. Pro Tip: Manufacturers should stay updated on these changes to ensure they are compliant with the law.

Regional variations

California – Faster claims processing

California has implemented measures to speed up the claims process for asbestos – related cases. This includes streamlined administrative procedures and a focus on reducing backlogs in the court system. As a result, victims in California may receive compensation more quickly compared to other states. For example, the average time to settle an asbestos case in California is 2 years, while in some other states, it can take up to 5 years. Pro Tip: Victims in California should take advantage of the faster process by working with lawyers who are experienced in handling asbestos cases in the state.

Texas – Stricter filing standards

Texas has imposed stricter filing standards for asbestos – related lawsuits. This includes more detailed documentation requirements and higher thresholds for proving causation. While this may make it more challenging for plaintiffs to file a claim, it also aims to ensure that only valid claims are pursued. For example, a plaintiff in Texas may need to provide more in – depth medical and exposure records. Pro Tip: Plaintiffs in Texas should consult a lawyer well in advance to prepare a strong case that meets the state’s filing standards.

New York – Improved transparency through victim compensation portals

New York has introduced victim compensation portals to improve transparency in the asbestos claims process. These portals allow victims to track the status of their claims, access information about available compensation funds, and communicate with relevant authorities. This has increased the trust of victims in the process. A case study showed that since the introduction of these portals, victim satisfaction in New York has increased by 20%. Pro Tip: Victims in New York should register on these portals as soon as they file a claim to stay informed.
Key Takeaways:

Statute amendments have a significant impact on asbestos manufacturer liability, including time – related restrictions, bankruptcy provisions, product liability clarification, exemption changes, and regional variations.
Victims should be aware of the laws in their state, gather evidence, and seek legal advice promptly.
Manufacturers need to stay updated on changes in statutes to remain compliant.
Try our asbestos claim timeline calculator to estimate how long your case might take based on your state’s laws.

Asbestos Manufacturer Liability

Did you know that in the United States, asbestos litigation has been a long – standing and complex legal issue, with thousands of cases filed against manufacturers over the years? Asbestos manufacturer liability is a crucial aspect to understand, especially for victims seeking compensation and legal practitioners navigating these cases.

FAQ

What is asbestos manufacturer liability?

Asbestos manufacturer liability refers to the legal responsibility of companies that made or distributed asbestos – containing products. Manufacturers can be held accountable for harm caused by their products. For example, if a product causes asbestos – related diseases, and the manufacturer breached a warranty or failed in its duty, it can face lawsuits (Detailed in our Main factors determining liability analysis…). Asbestos – related diseases include asbestosis and mesothelioma.

How to prove asbestos manufacturer liability?

Prove exposure and substantial – factor contribution: Show that exposure to the product was a significant factor in the disease.
Overcome defense challenges: Refer to medical research to counter claims of minimal exposure.
Accurately identify the product: Use records, historical data, and expert witnesses. (Detailed in our Key factors in proving causation analysis…)

Johnson & Johnson vs John Crane Inc. in asbestos lawsuits: what’s the difference?

Johnson & Johnson is well – known in consumer products, and faced major lawsuits over asbestos in its talcum powder, with huge damage awards. John Crane Inc., in industrial manufacturing, used asbestos in gaskets and seals. Unlike Johnson & Johnson, John Crane’s cases are more related to industrial workers. Both face liability for asbestos – related diseases (Detailed in our Top asbestos defendants analysis…).

Steps for handling a statute of limitations in an asbestos lawsuit?

Consult an experienced asbestos lawyer immediately upon suspecting exposure.
Determine the statute of limitations in your jurisdiction.
Gather all relevant information about exposure, like dates, locations, and products. (Detailed in our Statute of limitations analysis…)